Loading....
Members of the Massachusetts legislature have added language to the draft climate bill (H.4503) that would include nuclear power in the definition of “clean energy.” We are asking you to tell them loud and clear how wrong it is to attach the word “clean” to “nuclear power.” Scientifically and ethically WRONG.
This bill authorizes subsidies to the Seabrook (NH) and Millstone (CT) nuclear power plants, for up to 30 years. Contracts have to be “cost-effective,” but that criterion is not clearly defined - a wide-open door to justify the bailout of these aging nukes on the basis of jobs, property taxes, GHG emissions, or any other alleged public good under the state’s purview.
Legislators are looking for an easy way to meet the state’s clean energy goals while ignoring the elephant in the room -- the high-level waste stranded at the six reactor sites that are in Massachusetts or close to its borders, with no solution in sight.
We can and must do better than directing money to a failed industry and away from renewables.
We are asking that you call or write the following three legislators as well as your own representatives and senators to let them know that nuclear must not ever be in the mix of the energy we need to mitigate climate change. Remove both fission and fusion from H.4503 and any other climate bills!
Please share with anyone else who might be interested in the work we do.
Your donations make our work for a nuclear-free, carbon-free future possible.